Surely then falling unemployment can only be good news? Not necessarily.
Firstly, just to appreciate just how far we had fallen off a cliff, and what the rebound has looked like, lets compare the current cycle to previous ones.
Surely though, a falling unemployment rate can only be a good thing?
The red line, shows the unemployment rate. 8.3% and sharply falling, yes, that is certainly an improvement. However, to be confident that a fall in unemployment will feed through to the real economy, one would like to see that the fall in unemployment rate would be accompanied by a rise in the participation rate, basically that the fall in the unemployment rate would be felt by a higher proportion of the population. Alas no. Extrapolating from the graph, the US is well on its way to becoming the first country with no unemployment, yet nobody participating in the labour force!!!
Yes, jobs ARE being created. But not enough. The steady/flat black line (employment/population ratio) is indicative that the number of jobs being created are only enough to keep up with the increase in population.
But the news gets worse. The unemployment rate, and all the other statistics/graphs shown only deal with the quantity, they do not account for quality. Problem number 2, is that as with all statistics, the output is only as good as the input or assumptions made. The data in the labor force data, is subject to many revisions, often with a many year time-lag. Additionally, numbers are often not comparable, as a later consensus will suddenly show an additional x million people that previously hadn't been accounted for.
When looking at the quality of jobs generated, I prefer to go to the Feds website and look at tax data. Those figures are not played with whatsoever, there are no seasonal adjustments etc, nor is the data dependent on any population census. The numbers are reflective of the income tax received by the Government. No fudging whatsoever. A rising number is indicative of rising employment, and/or rising wages. And the numbers are startling.
The table is one that I made based on figures taken directly from the Feds website. They take 2 corresponding periods, the 4 month period from 1st October 2010 until 31st January 2012, and the corresponding period the following year. We can see that in the first period, the Government received $592.985B and over the course of the 4 months, there were an additional 571,000 jobs created. In the corresponding period the following year, the cumulative tax received by the Government FELL to $592.676B, despite an additional 715,000 new jobs created. Over the entire period, between 30th September 2010 and 31st January 2012, a period in which there were an ADDITIONAL 2.5 million jobs, aggregate tax revenue received fell. This means that yes, DESPITE new jobs being created, they were lower paid, poorer quality.
This is not a healthy state, and it seems to me to need some catalyst, to end this cycle. This has serious and substantial ramifications to the Treasury's forecasted debt issuance schedule. When issuing new debt, the Treasury works on many models, one of them being the rate of unemployment. Their working assumption of lower unemployment is going to need serious modification if the current trend of falling Government revenue despite falling unemployment continues.
And whilst I have focused on, and highlighted the negative trend in the US employment, Europe is in a far worse state.
In the US, whilst the unemployment trend is very much down, in Europe and the UK it is still on the way up.